Two Golfers; Two Images

When the Tiger Woods Nike ad first aired during the Masters, it was only hours until it went viral on the 'net. It currently holds the #2 spot on Ad Age's Viral Video Chart.
However, of the 11.2 million total views thus far, 51% are of parodies. Nike's Stefan Olander claims that "Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. We love when people engage and participate in the storytelling. Any confident brand should be." I'll agree that there's some good in engaging consumers on multiple levels as such, but I also think that the ad had a John Daly-esque engagement that is very un-Tiger. People were making fun of Tiger and Nike. Not normal. Remember this ad? It also included Tiger's deceased father's voice. Up until Saturday afternoon at the Masters, Tiger and his new Nike ad - along with his newly branded on-course demeanor - were the talk of the tournament. Tiger was smiling and shaking hands with the galleries all while hitting fairways and making putts. He was playing great golf and everything was under control. But when the putts didn't drop and the curse words did, the critics of both his brand and his game were left with more questions than answers. Similarly, his new ad engaged consumers, but it left a new and unkown taste in their mouth for the Tiger brand. Tiger is still one of the world's most recognized brands, but his brand's identity or what it represents is not clear to the the consumer and Nike definitely faces an up-hill battle to redefine his image.

Enter Phil Mickelson.

As Tiger's chances faded and his brand became harder to interpret, Phil's chances were realized and his sponsor was rewarded. Everything..and I mean EVERYTHING went right for Phil in his well-deserved victory at Augusta. From the 5-under stretch on Saturday to his second shot at 13 on Sunday, his on-course performance was the perfect pairing for what he was dealing with in his personal life. It was a Disney movie in HD, a feel good ending that couldn't have worked out better for Billy Payne and golf's traditionalists who desperately needed a feel-good story. It was also great for Phil's sponsors. Words like mistress, scandal and bootyism were replaced by family, integrity, and focus. Those are great words for your spokesperson to be associated with. Turning the first couple pages of the post-Masters Golf World issue last week, I wasn't suprised to see a Barclay's ad congratulating Phil and leveraging this picture perfect ending, but I was suprised to see how direct some of the verbage was. (An identical, full-page ad appeared in the WSJ the following week). Both ads depict an emotional Phil embracing his cancer-stricken wife just off the 18th green. They read:

"Congratulations to Phil Mickelson and his family on his victory ... Phil demonstrates why he is a great ambassador and role model for the game of golf. He personifies the game's values of integrity, focus, and precision, which are at the core of how we at Barclays are committed to earning success every day for our clients.”

Wow. They might as well have said, "We're really glad that Tiger is not our spokesperson." Considering the moral scrutiny that financial institutions are under, this couldn't have worked out better for the limey asset manager. Despite some gambling rumors, Phil has shown himself to be an honest gentlemen both on and off the course. Good for him and good for Barclays. He's been a great investment and what happened at the Master's took his brand to the next level.
Moreover, this all makes for more storylines, better competition and highly entertaining golf for ther rest of us. We'll be watching Tiger and Phil do battle at the PLAYERS and the year's remaining majors. I can't wait. It's gonna be great competition and we'll be watching every swing. But we'll also be watching their sponsors...to see how they react to the victories and failures of their most valuable and dynamic spokesmen.